Testamentary legacy in Italy
- Testamentary legacy in Italy
- What is meant exactly by the term "testamentary legacy"?
- Differences between inheritance and legacy
- Definition of testamentary legacy
- Testamentary legacy and difference with the institution of heir
- Some examples of testamentary legacies
- Fundamental characteristics of testamentary legacies
- Acceptance and renunciation of the legacy
- The testamentary legacy and forced heirship
- Legal advice for the testamentary legacy for a foreigner in Italy
When discussing wills, it is almost impossible not to consider the topic of the testamentary legacy, including the specific question of the testamentary legacy for foreigners in Italy considered in the broader context of international succession law.
Although the term “legacy” is now common even among non-experts, its understanding, together with its implications and the differences with respect to the notion of inheritance, often remains difficult for many people.
Boschetti Studio Legale offers clear and complete assistance on the meaning of the testamentary legacy and on its most common variants in daily practice. Thanks to the consolidated experience in legal support, also for foreigners residing in Italy, our firm deals with the management and application of the will with legacy, ensuring a secure and precise path both for those who draft the will and for those who benefit from it.
- Testamento
- Testamento olografo
- Legato testamentario
- Impugnazione testamenti
- Impugnazione testamento per lesione di legittima
- Come trovare un testamento
- Redazione del testamento
- Testamento internazionale
- Diseredazione per testamento
- Azione di restituzione del testamento
- Reintegrazione della quota di legittima
What is meant exactly by the term “testamentary legacy”?
In simple terms, a testamentary legacy represents a specific provision through which a person, by means of a will, decides to assign one or more particular assets to chosen individuals, called legatees.
This modality allows the testator to allocate with attention valuable assets such as jewellery, works of art, sums of money or real estate, avoiding division among heirs.
A law firm for successions, like Boschetti Studio Legale, can support you in drafting the will and ensure that every provision is correctly expressed without errors.
Differences between inheritance and legacy
Those who succeed after the death of a person can be distinguished into “heirs” and “legatees”.
The heir is the one who acquires the entire patrimony of the deceased or a part of it, while the legatee is the one who receives specific assets, such as a house.
This distinction has relevance in various aspects, since the heir is responsible for the debts of the deceased, even for an amount higher than the value of the assets received, and might therefore have to affect their personal patrimony. On the contrary, the legatee is usually not required to be liable for inheritance debts, and their liability is limited to the value of the assigned assets.
Furthermore, the legatee acquires the legacy automatically at the moment of the opening of the succession, coinciding with the death of the deceased. The heir, instead, becomes such only after having accepted the inheritance, either explicitly or implicitly. This is because, being responsible for the debts of the deceased, the law requires that they clearly express their will to become heir.
On the other hand, the legatee generally receives a benefit, and it is presumed that they want to accept it, although they always have the freedom to renounce the legacy.
The concept of inheritance is therefore opposed to that of legacy. The legacy is the legal institution through which the testator allocates a specific asset to a subject, and for this reason in common language the legatee is considered a successor by particular title. On the contrary, the heir is the one who succeeds universally to all the patrimony or to a share of it.
In the regulation of the two institutions, the differences are marked:
- the inheritance is a necessary institution, since it must always exist, even in the absence of a will or of heirs who accept. In the absence of acceptance, the patrimony is devolved to the State. The legacy, instead, is an eventual institution that must be expressly provided for in a will.
- the inheritance is acquired through an acceptance (tacit or express), while the legacy is obtained automatically at the moment of death, except for the possibility of renunciation by the legatee.
- only the heirs are responsible for the debts, while the legatee is not required to pay such obligations and is liable for any charges only within the limit of the value of the assets received.
- furthermore, the heir continues to possess the assets of the deceased from the opening of the succession, while the legatee starts a new possession on the assets attributed to them.
- finally, another distinction concerns the possibility of affixing terms to the inheritance or to the legacy: it is not possible to provide for a term in inheritance succession, since a cardinal principle in succession matters is that according to which “semel heres semper heres”, while the right of the legatee can be limited in time with both initial and final terms.
Definition of testamentary legacy
As already anticipated, the testamentary legacy represents that fundamental legal instrument through which a person, by means of a will, disposes of certain assets or rights in favour of a legatee.
It is distinguished from the inheritance in that it confers a specific and limited right, rather than a share of the entire inheritance patrimony.
The legacy, therefore, is configured as an act that reflects the will of the testator consisting of wanting to attribute directly assets or advantages to certain persons, without necessarily involving the entire group of heirs.
Within the framework of legacies, two significant categories are found: the sublegacy and the prelegacy.
- The sublegacy occurs when the performance in favour of a subject (the sublegatee) is at the expense of another legatee, rather than of the heir themselves. The sublegatee emerges as an autonomous subject called to the succession by particular title, being able to receive assets or performances independently of the main legatee. Furthermore, the sublegacy can be both real, concerning specific assets, and obligatory, referring to general performances.
- In contrast to the sublegacy, the prelegacy implies a legacy attributed to one of the heirs or to multiple co-heirs. This legacy integrates two distinct roles: that of co-heir burdened and that of legatee, thus binding the beneficiary to two distinct patrimonial attributions, namely the assignment as heir and the acquisition of the legacy. Such duplicity of functions allows the prelegatee to manage their right flexibly, since they can accept the legacy while renouncing the inheritance.
It is crucial to highlight that the prelegacy is considered a legacy for the entire amount of the succession, weighing on the entire inheritance, and therefore also on the share that pertains to the legatee in their capacity as heir.
This characteristic implies that the prelegacy significantly affects the composition of the inheritance patrimony and the distribution of rights among heirs.
In conclusion, the testamentary legacy, with its various variants such as the sublegacy and the prelegacy, reflects the complexity of the patrimonial relationships within the succession.
Through these provisions, the testator can manifest their will in a detailed manner, allowing precise and targeted organisation of the patrimonial succession, which takes into account the needs and expectations of the beneficiaries. The regulation of these legal institutions not only ensures greater clarity in the management of patrimonies, but also offers an opportunity to personalise and direct testamentary wishes effectively. Thanks to our experience, we can help you to draft the formula of the testamentary legacy suited to your needs and to ensure that your wishes are respected without unforeseen events.
Testamentary legacy and difference with the institution of heir
Having clarified the distinction between the legacy and the inheritance, it is well understood how the institution of heir implies the transfer of the entire patrimony or of a specific part of it to the heirs, and of all legal positions, including passive ones, pertaining to the de cuius.
On the contrary, the legacy refers to the assignment of specific assets, such as personal objects, with sums of money or various rights, without the legatee having to deal with inheritance debts, except within certain limits.
The heir, therefore, manages a part of the inheritance, addressing all related legal and financial questions, while the legatee benefits from a more restricted and defined advantage, devoid of the complexities associated with succession in general.
Some examples of testamentary legacies
What are the most common forms of legacy?
It is fundamental to understand that there are various typologies of legacy. Some are specifically provided for by law, while others derive from consolidated practices in testamentary provisions.
Boschetti Studio Legale will help you to know the main and most widespread categories of legacy, and this can be useful to you if you have to interpret or manage a will that provides for such provisions.
- Legacy of single assets. In practice, the legacy that attributes the right of ownership on specific assets is the most frequent case, including also the real estate (so-called testamentary legacy of immovable) that is part of the patrimony of the testator at the moment of their death.
This form of legacy allows the testator to designate particular assets of their patrimony to chosen recipients, ensuring that their last wishes are respected with accuracy and attention to detail.
The regulation provides that, when a legacy concerns the ownership of a specific asset or a real right of property of the testator, the transfer of such right to the beneficiary takes place automatically with the death of the testator.
In practice, at the moment of death of the testator, the legatee, that is to say the person to whom the asset is destined, does not have to decide whether to accept or not the asset, since they immediately become the owner.
This represents another important distinction between legacy and inheritance: as known, those who receive an inheritance, or a part of it, must express their acceptance to come into possession of it.
- Legacy of universality. Another common type is the legacy of universality of assets.
The definition of “legacy of universality” refers to a testamentary provision in which a testator decides to leave a complete set of assets. This could include, for example, an entire collection or a category of assets, such as a personal library or even an entire business.
A good example of legacy is that of a passionate reader who decides to donate their precious library to a grandchild. In this case, the legacy is not limited to one or two specific books, but includes the entire collection of books that the testator possessed at the moment of their death.
It is important to underline that, in similar circumstances, the beneficiary, or legatee, receives everything as a single “package”. They do not have the possibility to accept only some parts of the universality, such as some favourite books from the library: they must take everything or completely renounce the legacy.
The legacy of universality is distinguished from the others in that it considers a set of assets as a single entity, rather than as individual elements. Remaining on the example of the collection of books, this ensures that the entire “collection” is preserved and transferred to someone who, hopefully, will appreciate it as much as the testator.
The category of legacy of universality also includes the legacy of inheritance and the legacy of business.
Of these, however, being particularly complex, I will speak in separate articles.
- Legacy of sums of money. When mentioning a “legacy of sum of money”, reference is made to a specific provision in a will, through which the testator decides to leave a certain sum of money to a person.
For example, you might find in the will phrases such as “I leave to Mario 10,000 euros for the affection he has shown me”. This represents a classic example of legacy of sum of money.
At the death of the testator, therefore, the legatee will be entitled to receive that sum (from the heirs or, in any case, from the person or entity indicated by the testator).
The legacy of sum of money, which can manifest itself in various forms in practice, can prove particularly complex depending on how it is drafted.
A significant problem, in practice, concerns the identification of the source from which the liquidity must be drawn to pay the legatee.
Generally, in the simplest and most linear cases (as in the previous example), the beneficiary, or legatee, is not required to worry about where the money will come from. It is the task of the heir who manages the inheritance to decide from which source to draw the specified sum. This implies that the heir can decide to use funds from a specific current account, from other inheritance assets or even from personal resources to satisfy the legacy.
However, it can happen that the testator has indicated a source from which to draw the funds, for example a current account that, at the moment of the testator’s death, is no longer active or does not contain sufficient resources.
In such situations, the question becomes very complex for the heirs and legatees involved, and is not always easy to resolve.
In summary, the legacy of sum of money can be a very useful instrument for the testator, but if not managed correctly, it can give rise to considerable difficulties.
- Legacy of alimony. Through this legacy, the testator imposes on a subject, often an heir, the obligation to provide regular financial support to a designated beneficiary, for a defined period or even for the entire life of the latter.
This form of sustenance can be defined in the will with very precise criteria: one can establish the duration of the maintenance (for example, for a certain number of years or for the entire life of the beneficiary) and define from when to start payments, which can begin following a specific event or from an established date.
To be able to receive “alimony”, however, the beneficiaries must demonstrate that they are really in a state of need, considering both their habitual lifestyle and their current economic conditions. The sum of money provided periodically must be adequate both to their needs and to the economic capacities of the one obliged to pay it, without exceeding what is necessary to ensure a dignified standard of living, in line with their social position.
The amount destined to alimony varies according to circumstances and must ensure to the beneficiary what is fundamental for their sustenance, adapting over time to any changes in their needs.
If, for example, in a certain period the beneficiary is no longer in a state of need, the right to alimony can be suspended, to then possibly resume if needs were to present themselves again.
- Legacy for a person residing abroad. For foreigners residing in Italy, or for a person residing abroad, the legacy represents an ideal instrument to allocate assets located on Italian territory to family members residing abroad, avoiding the complexities of international division. Our law firm, specialised in assistance to foreigners in Italy, ensures complete and secure support for those who wish to transfer real estate or funds clearly and without risks.
Fundamental characteristics of testamentary legacies
Testamentary legacies present many characteristics in common with the will in general, but also possess distinctive elements that characterise them as particular provisions within a will.
- Revocability and formalities of the legacy. Similarly to the revocability of the will, the legacy can also be modified or annulled until the last moment of the testator’s life.
This possibility allows the testator to adapt their final wishes to life situations, which can change over time.
Furthermore, although particularly rigorous formalities are not necessary, legacies must always be expressed within a will that respects legal regulations. This ensures that the provisions are explicit, comprehensible and compliant with the regulatory framework in force.
- Patrimoniality of the legacy. Usually, the assets object of the legacy have patrimonial value, since they are intended to transfer an economic benefit to the legatee.
This highlights the most common intent of legacies: to provide enrichment to the beneficiary for reasons of generosity or gratitude. However, it is essential to note that the generous character of a legacy, that is to say its altruistic nature, is not an indispensable requirement for its validity.
In fact, a legacy can also be used to satisfy a pre-existing obligation or to impose a charge on the legatee, thus demonstrating the flexibility and complexity of these testamentary provisions.
In some cases, furthermore, the legacy might not provide an immediate economic benefit for the beneficiary, for example if it is linked to a specific obligation or task that the legatee must fulfil.
Acceptance and renunciation of the legacy
As already mentioned, the mechanism of acceptance of a legacy differs considerably from that of the inheritance. Unlike the latter, to become effective, a legacy does not require a formal act of acceptance by the beneficiary.
This implies that a legatee automatically becomes the holder of the legacy at the opening of the succession, even if they are not aware of the existence of the legacy itself.
According to Italian law, article 649 of the codice civile establishes that the legacy is acquired without the need for an explicit declaration of acceptance by the beneficiary.
However, it is fundamental to underline that the legatee always has the possibility to renounce the legacy. This faculty of renunciation allows the beneficiary to decline the legacy for any reason, even in case of disadvantages or charges associated with it.
The law does not distinguish between legacies that immediately transfer ownership or rights to the legatee and those that require the fulfilment of specific conditions or obligations. In both cases, the patrimony of the legatee is considered enriched from the beginning of the succession, even if, in some situations, the enrichment may consist only of a credit right rather than a physical asset or a real right.
It is important, however, to take into consideration the possibility of renunciation, which allows the legatee to preserve their legal situation should the legacy entail unwanted consequences. This right of renunciation is subject to a prescription of ten years, after which it can no longer be exercised.
Renunciation can be a prudent choice in contexts in which the legacy, instead of constituting an advantage, imposes burdens or potential responsibilities, as in the case of a property in poor condition (so-called testamentary legacy of property), which could cause damage or represent a legal risk for the legatee.
The testamentary legacy and forced heirship
The testamentary legacy too, like the other testamentary provisions and donations, can prove harmful to the share of forced heirship that the law reserves to forced heirs. In these circumstances, the forced heir who considers themselves harmed by the legacy with respect to their reserved share can contest the legacy through the action of reduction.
However, the legislation has provided for two specific variants of legacy, in order to allow the testator to respect the rights of forced heirs, avoiding that they can contest other testamentary provisions or donations.
- The legacy in substitution of forced heirship. The “legacy in substitution of forced heirship” refers to a particular testamentary provision that allows the testator to confer one or more specific assets to a forced heir, replacing their “reserved share” established by law.
This share represents the part of the inheritance that, by law, must be assigned to the closest relatives, such as the spouse, the children and the parents, regardless of testamentary provisions.
With this type of legacy, the testator has the opportunity to allocate specific assets to certain heirs, thus avoiding excessive divisions of the patrimony and potential conflicts among beneficiaries.
For example, a father might decide to leave a work of art of great value to one of his children, replacing it with the portion of inheritance that would be due to them by law as forced heirship.
According to article 551 of the codice civile, the forced heir who receives a legacy in substitution of forced heirship has the faculty to decide whether to accept the legacy, thus renouncing the share of inheritance that would be due to them by law, or refuse it to request their legitimate part. If the value of the legacy is lower than that of forced heirship, the heir does not have the right to request the difference, unless they renounce the legacy and request their entire share of forced heirship.
It is crucial that the testator’s intention to substitute the forced heirship with a legacy be expressed in a clear and unequivocal manner. In the absence of such clarity, the provision could be interpreted as a “legacy on account of forced heirship”, which is considered an advance on the inheritance rights of the forced heir, who can in any case advance claims for the part of inheritance due to them according to the law.
- The legacy on account of forced heirship. Unlike the legacy in substitution of forced heirship, the “legacy on account of forced heirship” occurs when a forced heir receives a legacy that must be considered as an advance on the “reserved share”. In this scenario, if the forced heir receives an asset through legacy and the value of this asset is lower than their reserved share, they have the possibility to request an integration through the action of reduction, to receive what is due to them by law. If instead they decide not to be interested in the legacy asset, they can renounce it and request directly their entire share of forced heirship. If the value of the legacy asset exceeds that of the reserved share, the forced heir can in any case retain the asset, and the excess will weigh on the available part of the inheritance, that is to say that part on which the testator can freely dispose.
The main difference between “legacy on account of forced heirship” and “legacy in substitution of forced heirship” lies in the fact that, in the first case, the legatee can request an integration of the value of the legacy through an action of reduction to obtain the complete reserved share.
In the second case, instead, the forced heir is forced to choose between accepting the legacy and renouncing the reserved share, or refusing the legacy to request the entire reserved share as heir.
Conclusions on the testamentary legacy and practical suggestions
Conclusions on the testamentary legacy and practical suggestions
The problems that can arise regarding testamentary legacies are very different from each other.
Boschetti Studio Legale, with its team of lawyers specialised in succession law, makes available experience and competence to provide you with all the practical suggestions you need in case you find yourself managing an inheritance situation involving problematic legacies.
We always pay maximum attention to the interpretation of the clause that contains the legacy, taking into consideration the will of the testator, which can emerge not only from the will itself, but also from other sources.
Legacies, as well as wills in general, are frequently drafted in a confused way, to the point that it can be difficult to identify what the object of the legacy is or, indeed, to understand whether it is a legacy or a designation of heir. It is therefore important to pay particular attention.
The second suggestion that our lawyers will give you concerns the need not to take decisions regarding a possible renunciation of the legacy with superficiality. It is fundamental always to assess with caution, together with our team, what effects a certain action may have.
Finally, to make the wisest and most informed choice regarding the inheritance or legacy, we invite you to turn to our qualified experts. At our law firm, you will find professionalism, competence and a solid capacity to resolve every doubt and problem of yours, ensuring valuable support in every phase of the inheritance process.
Scenari tipici / Casi studio
Gli scenari tipici sono stati elaborati da una fusione delle fattispecie più significative di diritto di famiglia che lo Studio tratta abitualmente, al fine di creare un caso strutturato e complesso, utile al lettore per orientarsi nella gestione del proprio caso personale. I casi studio illustrano invece vicende singole, realmente trattate, con dati e dettagli anonimizzati per garantire la riservatezza dei clienti.
Registrazione del contratto di convivenza e regolarizzazione del partner straniero
Coppia residente a Roma: cittadino italiano e compagna straniera priva di documenti di soggiorno. Ricorso cautelare ex art. 700 c.p.c. per tutela della convivenza, seguito da pratica per carta di soggiorno familiare UE.
Adozione di maggiorenne per riconoscere un rapporto familiare di fatto
Cittadino statunitense residente a Roma con legame affettivo stabile con lo zio acquisito. Procedimento per adozione di persona maggiorenne ex artt. 291 e ss. del Codice Civile per formalizzare il rapporto familiare.
Contratto di convivenza per coppia italo-brasiliana: tutela patrimonio e permesso di soggiorno
Imprenditore italiano e compagna brasiliana conviventi da tre anni a Milano. Tre vulnerabilità interconnesse: migratoria, patrimoniale e successoria, risolte con un intervento coordinato su tre fronti paralleli.
Adozione in Colombia: coppia italiana realizza il sogno dopo 3 anni di percorso
Una coppia sposata da otto anni intraprende l’adozione internazionale con la Colombia. Un percorso attraverso due ordinamenti, tre istituzioni italiane e l’autorità centrale colombiana.
Successione con eredi in 4 paesi diversi: coordinamento Italia-USA-UK-Svizzera
Un imprenditore italiano lascia un patrimonio distribuito tra Italia, Stati Uniti e Svizzera, con quattro eredi in altrettanti paesi. Quattro ordinamenti, quattro sistemi fiscali da coordinare in parallelo.
Adozione maggiorenne figlio del partner: riconoscimento legame affettivo ventennale
Un uomo di cinquantotto anni chiede di adottare il figlio trentenne della moglie, cresciuto insieme da vent’anni. Un legame reale che la legge non riconosceva, con implicazioni successorie per i figli biologici.
Impugnazione testamento per lesione di legittima: recuperati 800.000 euro per gli eredi
Due figli ricevono 20.000 euro ciascuno da un testamento che lascia quasi tutto alla seconda moglie del padre. Un’azione di riduzione per lesione della quota di legittima risolta in mediazione.
Pianificazione successoria azienda familiare: passaggio generazionale da 3 milioni
Un imprenditore di sessantadue anni deve trasferire un’azienda da 50 dipendenti al figlio che la gestisce, tutelando la figlia che ha scelto un altro percorso. Patto di famiglia e holding per garantire continuità.
Adozione internazionale da parte di single: quando la legge apre una strada che pochi conoscono
Una donna single di quarantacinque anni intraprende l’adozione internazionale. Un percorso giuridicamente possibile ma poco conosciuto, che richiede una strategia legale specifica fin dal decreto di idoneità.
Eredità digitale: gestione criptovalute e asset digitali del defunto
Un professionista muore lasciando criptovalute per oltre 600.000 euro su wallet e exchange, senza istruzioni di accesso. Un patrimonio digitale che rischiava di andare perduto per sempre.
Rettifica del nome per persona transgender: documenti coerenti con la propria identità
Una professionista trentaduenne, in trattamento ormonale da otto anni, con documenti ancora al nome maschile di nascita. La discrepanza anagrafica generava outing forzati quotidiani in ambito lavorativo, bancario e amministrativo.
Attribuzione di sesso e aggiornamento di oltre 20 documenti: dalla sentenza alla nuova identità anagrafica
Un dirigente di 45 anni con sentenza di rettificazione già ottenuta si trova davanti al vero ostacolo: coordinare carta d’identità, patente, laurea, contratti di lavoro, mutuo e polizze assicurative presso enti con procedure non uniformate.
Legal advice for the testamentary legacy for a foreigner in Italy
Relying on a lawyer for inheritance law is fundamental, especially for foreigners residing in Italy who wish to leave assets to persons residing in other countries. Legal advice concerning the particular provisions to be inserted in the legatary will, as well as in the area of testamentary legacy for foreigners in Italy, allows ensuring the validity of testamentary provisions and addressing any problems connected to international regulation.
By turning to our law firm for the testamentary legacy you will find all the support necessary to protect your rights and realise your wishes without obstacles.
Hai questioni legate alla famiglia o alle eredità? Siamo qui per aiutarti. Lasciaci i tuoi dettagli qui sotto e parliamone. Ti contatteremo nel più breve tmepo possibile per capire come potremmo supportarti al meglio.
Via dei Gracchi, 151
00192 Roma – Italy
info@familylawboschetti.com
Tel: + 39 – 06 889 21971
solo su prenotazione
Giorno: Lunedì – Venerdì
Orari: 9.00-13.00 / 16.00-20.00
Who pays the testamentary legacy?
The testamentary legacy is generally borne by the heir or heirs, who are obliged to satisfy the testamentary provisions of the deceased. If the will specifies assets to be assigned as legacies, the heirs must ensure that they transfer them to the legatees. In the absence of sufficient assets, the legatees might receive monetary compensation. It is fundamental that the heirs respect such obligations to ensure the execution of the will of the testator.
What must the legatee of a will do?
The legatee of a will automatically acquires the legacy, which consists of specific assets or rights, and proceeds to receive them according to the modalities established in the will. After the death of the testator, the legatee must verify the validity of the will and follow any legal procedures to obtain the assigned assets. Furthermore, it is important that the legatee informs themselves about any taxes or obligations linked to the received legacy.
Who can contest a legacy? The contestation of a legacy can be made by anyone who has a legitimate interest, such as the heirs or the legatees themselves. The reasons for which one can contest include the lack of validity of the will, the violation of testamentary provisions, or the capacity of the testator at the moment of drafting the document. The heirs can contest a legacy if they consider that it negatively affects their inheritance share or rights. How does a testamentary legacy work? The testamentary legacy allows the testator, in the deed of last wishes, to assign specific assets to a legatee, who automatically acquires such assets or rights at the moment of the testator's death. This type of patrimonial provision is distinct from the inheritance, since it does not imply succession to the entire patrimony. The legacy can concern real estate, movable assets or rights, and is enforceable if the conditions established in the will are respected. Clarity in the provisions is crucial. How does inheritance work in America? In the United States, inheritance rules vary from state to state, influenced by local laws and specific regulations. However, common principles regulate the distribution of assets based on the will of the deceased expressed in a will or, in its absence, according to the laws on intestate succession. Furthermore, fiscal questions, such as inheritance taxes, differ between states and can influence the final distribution of inherited assets. How does succession work in Croatia? Succession in Croatia follows principles similar to Italian ones, with clear rules for the division of assets. The assets of the deceased are generally transferred to the heirs based on the testamentary will or, in the absence of a will, according to the law. Legitimate succession provides for an equitable division among family members. Croatian law also recognises the figure of the legacy, allowing the testator to assign specific assets to certain subjects.
The contestation of a legacy can be made by anyone who has a legitimate interest, such as the heirs or the legatees themselves. The reasons for which one can contest include the lack of validity of the will, the violation of testamentary provisions, or the capacity of the testator at the moment of drafting the document. The heirs can contest a legacy if they consider that it negatively affects their inheritance share or rights.
How does a testamentary legacy work?
The testamentary legacy allows the testator, in the deed of last wishes, to assign specific assets to a legatee, who automatically acquires such assets or rights at the moment of the testator's death. This type of patrimonial provision is distinct from the inheritance, since it does not imply succession to the entire patrimony. The legacy can concern real estate, movable assets or rights, and is enforceable if the conditions established in the will are respected. Clarity in the provisions is crucial.
How does inheritance work in America?
In the United States, inheritance rules vary from state to state, influenced by local laws and specific regulations. However, common principles regulate the distribution of assets based on the will of the deceased expressed in a will or, in its absence, according to the laws on intestate succession. Furthermore, fiscal questions, such as inheritance taxes, differ between states and can influence the final distribution of inherited assets.
How does succession work in Croatia?
Succession in Croatia follows principles similar to Italian ones, with clear rules for the division of assets.
The assets of the deceased are generally transferred to the heirs based on the testamentary will or, in the absence of a will, according to the law. Legitimate succession provides for an equitable division among family members.
Croatian law also recognises the figure of the legacy, allowing the testator to assign specific assets to certain subjects.




