Skip to main content

Spouse living abroad and refusing to cooperate: how to proceed with separation

When a marriage breaks down and the other spouse lives permanently outside Italy, separation does not become impossible, but it requires a few additional steps and an organised approach. Difficulties almost always arise from two factors: serving the court documents on the spouse who is abroad and continuing the proceedings even if the other spouse does not respond. Understanding where to begin, how international service works and which legal instruments are available makes it easier to approach the process with confidence, while avoiding mistakes that could later jeopardise the outcome. In this guide, we explain step by step how to organise the proceedings when one spouse lives in Italy and the other is abroad.

Separation when a spouse lives abroad: where to begin

You have decided to separate, but your spouse now lives in another country, and the first question that comes to mind is the most practical one: can I proceed here in Italy, or must I pursue the case abroad? This is the concern raised by almost all our clients in this situation, and in most cases the answer is reassuring: where one spouse lives abroad, the Italian courts will often have jurisdiction over the separation. The law governing Italy’s legal relations with other countries allows access to the Italian courts not only in ordinary situations, but also where one of the spouses is an Italian citizen or where the marriage was celebrated in Italy. These two connecting factors, which arise very frequently, are sufficient to establish jurisdiction in Italy, even if the spouses’ married life has since moved elsewhere.

European legislation further strengthens this possibility by focusing mainly on where the spouses have lived and, under certain conditions, allowing the proceedings to be brought before the court of the place where the applicant lives. For the spouse who has remained in Italy, the practical message is clear: as a general rule, there is no need to pursue the other spouse in the country to which they have moved, as the case can often be started in Italy.

Once it has been established that proceedings may be brought in Italy, it is still necessary to determine which court has territorial jurisdiction. This depends on practical aspects of the spouses’ lives, including whether there are minor children, where each spouse resides and where the last family home was located. For this reason, when we are instructed in a case of this kind, the first step is not to draft a court document, but to identify four essential facts: the spouses’ nationalities, the place where the marriage was celebrated, the residence of each spouse and whether there are children. This brief preliminary assessment determines both the choice of court and the structure of the entire procedure, and it is at this stage that mistakes which would later be costly to correct can be avoided.

How court documents are served abroad

Once the jurisdictional issue has been resolved, the matter that causes the greatest anxiety in practice arises: how can a spouse living abroad be formally informed that proceedings have been started? This is a legitimate concern, because the case cannot proceed until the spouse has been formally served. The service of court documents abroad is intended to ensure that the other party has a genuine opportunity to defend themselves, and it cannot be carried out through the informal methods used for ordinary correspondence. It must follow specific channels established by international agreements.

Everything depends on the country where the spouse lives. If the spouse is in another European Union Member State, service is carried out under the European regulation governing the service of documents. The document is transmitted from the competent authority in Italy to the relevant authority in the destination country, which serves it according to its own rules. If the spouse lives outside the European Union, the applicable framework is generally the 1965 Hague Convention, specifically designed for the transmission of judicial documents across borders. Identifying immediately which of these two situations applies is essential in order to follow the correct procedure without unnecessary delay.

The main difference experienced by the client concerns timing. Serving a document abroad takes months rather than days. An official translation into the language of the destination country is often required, and proof of service must be carefully preserved. These are technical details, but they are decisive, because defective service may be challenged and result in months of work being lost, in addition to jeopardising the recognition of the judgment abroad. In our experience, a significant part of the success of the case depends on this stage. For this reason, from the very beginning we identify the appropriate channel according to the country concerned and, where necessary, rely on our local correspondents to monitor service on the ground. Properly managing this step is not a mere administrative formality, it is what supports the entire case.

Untraceable spouse: can the separation still proceed?

Sometimes the spouse not only lives abroad but is effectively untraceable. They may have changed address without providing any information, ended all contact or moved to an unknown location. Even where a spouse cannot be located, separation is still possible. The legal system provides specific mechanisms that allow proceedings to continue when the person to be served cannot be found, ensuring that one spouse’s disappearance does not become an insurmountable obstacle for the other.

The essential condition, however, is that the spouse is genuinely untraceable rather than merely assumed to be so. Before using the special methods of service intended for persons whose whereabouts are unknown, serious and documented searches must be carried out. These may include checks with population registers, enquiries regarding the last known address and verifications through consular authorities. This is not a purely formal requirement. Courts have refused to recognise foreign judgments obtained through service procedures for untraceable persons where the applicant actually knew where the other spouse lived. In other words, attempting to bypass ordinary service by falsely claiming not to know the other spouse’s whereabouts creates the risk that the judgment may later be considered defective for violating the right of defence.

The correct approach therefore involves two steps. First, genuine efforts must be made to locate the spouse and to use the ordinary international communication channels. Only after those attempts have been exhausted without success should the procedures specifically intended for genuinely untraceable persons be used. In this way, the separation may proceed on a sound legal basis without exposing the outcome to challenges that could arise precisely when the judgment needs to be relied upon, possibly in the country where the other spouse has settled. To locate a spouse living abroad, the Law Firm normally relies on its network of partners, lawyers and agencies capable of carrying out searches locally.

International contested separation proceedings in the absence of the other spouse

Where the spouse has been properly served but chooses not to participate, the proceedings continue in any event. This situation is known as default of appearance. The absent party does not prevent the case from moving forward, and the court may still issue a decision. In such circumstances, international contested separation proceedings do not come to a standstill because of the other spouse’s silence, but continue to judgment on the basis of the evidence submitted.

There is, however, an important safeguard that should be understood from the outset because it affects the strength and enforceability of the outcome. European legislation and international conventions provide that a judgment issued against a party who did not appear may be recognised and enforced abroad only if the originating document was served in sufficient time and in a manner that allowed that party to organise a defence. It is therefore not enough that the spouse remained absent. It must be possible to demonstrate that they were given a genuine opportunity to defend themselves and chose not to do so.

For this reason, where the respondent lives in another country and does not appear, the court does not proceed hastily. The applicable rules require specific safeguards and may even require the proceedings to be suspended until it has been established that the person actually received the document, or that every reasonable effort was made to serve it, while allowing sufficient time for the person to participate. The practical consequence is clear: default of appearance is not an automatic advantage for the applicant. It leads to a legally sound outcome only where service has been handled impeccably from the outset. Properly organising this stage means obtaining a judgment that is not only valid in Italy, but is also capable of being recognised abroad.

How long does a separation take when a spouse lives abroad?

It is difficult to provide an exact timeframe in advance, because the duration depends on several variables. The factor that has the greatest impact is the international element itself. Transmitting documents to another country takes months rather than days, which extends the initial phase compared with a case conducted entirely within Italy. As a general rule, separation proceedings involving a spouse abroad therefore have a longer overall timeframe, particularly before the case reaches the first substantive hearing before the court.

Much also depends on the attitude of the other spouse. If the parties can reach an agreement, even from a distance, on the terms of the separation, a consensual procedure remains possible and allows the case to be concluded more quickly, while reducing opportunities for conflict. Where there is no agreement, or the spouse refuses to cooperate, contested proceedings are required, with the procedural steps and delays connected with international service and the possible absence of the other party.

Two further elements also affect the duration. The first is the country where the other spouse lives. Cooperation between authorities is generally faster within the European Union, while service in countries outside Europe tends to take longer. The second is the presence of minor children, which requires the court to carry out more detailed assessments regarding custody and maintenance and may increase the overall duration of the proceedings. A realistic estimate can be given only after reviewing the specific circumstances. What should be anticipated is that the other spouse’s distance may postpone certain stages, but it does not prevent the court from reaching a decision. With a carefully planned strategy, even the timing can become predictable and manageable.

When to entrust the case to a lawyer

Handling a separation alone where the other spouse lives abroad and is unwilling to cooperate creates several risks, because the technical issues multiply precisely in the areas where mistakes have the greatest consequences. Choosing the competent court, identifying the correct method of service abroad, dealing with an untraceable spouse and conducting proceedings in the absence of the other party are all steps that require specific experience in international family law. An approximate approach at any one of these stages may affect the entire case.

A lawyer experienced in cross border cases becomes involved from the initial assessment, determining where the case may and should be brought and which rules of territorial jurisdiction apply. The lawyer then manages international service by selecting the appropriate instrument for the destination country, arranging any necessary translations and preserving proof of delivery, thereby protecting the proceedings from future challenges. Where the spouse is genuinely untraceable, the lawyer documents the searches carried out before resorting to the special service procedures for persons whose whereabouts are unknown, reducing the risk that the judgment may later be challenged.

There is also a final aspect that is often overlooked by those focused only on the immediate situation. In many cases, the Italian judgment will also need to produce effects in the country where the other spouse lives, for example to update civil status records or regulate financial matters. Building an organised case file and following impeccable procedures from the outset is the best guarantee that the outcome will remain stable and be recognised beyond Italy’s borders. In these circumstances, instructing a professional is not an additional cost, but the most effective way to transform a complex matter into a clear and secure process. The Law Firm remains available to assess the specific circumstances of each case.

Autor

Avv. Francesca Farina

Lawyer, Rome Bar · Boschetti Studio Legale

She graduated in Law at Roma Tre University with a thesis in Family Law and worked with Save the Children on the protection of minors. Specialised in family law, succession and international adoptions, with a Master’s degree in Legal Psychology and Forensic Psychopathology. Since 2024 she has led the family and succession team of Boschetti Studio Legale.

Rome Bar Association

Roma Tre Degree

Save the Children

Master’s in Legal Psychology

Ultimi articoli pubblicati

© BOSCHETTI STUDIO LEGALE SRL - società tra avvocati - Società unipersonale - Via dei Gracchi, 151 - 00192 Roma - Iscritta al Registro Imprese di Roma - REA n. 1695445 CCIAA Roma - C.F. - P.IVA: 17095831008 - Capitale sociale: € 20.000,00 euro i.v. - Tel. +39 0688921971 - mail: info@studiolegaleboschetti.com - pec: boschettistudiolegale@legalmail.it - Privacy Policy - Cookie Policy